Checked on October 13, 2026
Under FCC 26-67, once the revised rules take effect, a customer's STOP reply to an informational automated text may be treated as revoking consent only for the specific category of informational messages it answered. A STOP sent to advertising or telemarketing still revokes consent for all future advertising or telemarketing robocalls from that caller. The FCC 26-67 Report and Order says the amendments take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. We found no Federal Register publication by October 13, 2026, so there is no calendar effective date to give yet.
Prefer to watch? See the short video version of this guide.
The FCC adopted the order on September 30, 2026 and released it on October 1, 2026. According to the order, the changes let callers apply a revocation to the relevant category of informational robocalls and designate an exclusive way to revoke consent. The FCC also amended an exemption so financial institutions can more easily send account fraud alerts. For a small business, the practical work is to separate message categories, state the opt-out method clearly, and make sure each request reaches the right suppression process.
Does a STOP reply now stop all my business texts or only one type?
It depends on the message, and the new treatment is not effective yet. The FCC says the category-specific change applies only to informational robocalls. In this proceeding, the order defines an informational robocall as one that does not contain an advertisement or constitute telemarketing. It defines robocall to include a call or text sent using an automatic telephone dialing system, plus a call made with an artificial or prerecorded voice.
The FCC's own example shows the operational problem. Under the earlier reading, when a customer revoked consent in response to payment reminders, the caller had to stop unrelated robocalls such as fraud alerts, multi-factor authentication, appointment reminders, and utility outage calls, even if the customer did not mean to stop those messages. FCC 26-67 allows the caller to treat that request as directed only to the particular informational category that prompted it.
Picture a service business that sends an automated payment reminder. A customer replies STOP. Under the earlier reading described by the FCC, that response could also cut off a later fraud alert and appointment reminder. Once the amendments take effect, the business may process that response for the payment-reminder category while leaving separately categorized informational messages in place. That flexibility comes from the FCC order, and it does not extend to advertising or telemarketing.
Can my business choose how customers opt out?
Yes, once the amendments take effect, but the choice has conditions. FCC 26-67 says a caller may designate an exclusive revocation method using an automated interactive voice or key-press mechanism during a call, specific standardized words sent in reply to an incoming text, and/or a website or telephone number provided by the caller. The designated method must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously on the call or in the text.
For text messages, the FCC says a sender can meet the disclosure requirement by displaying even one standardized word in every message. The 2024 Federal Register rule identifies the standardized reply words as stop, quit, end, revoke, opt out, cancel, and unsubscribe. A short instruction such as Reply STOP to opt out therefore gives the customer a visible route and gives the business a specific input to process. Even when only STOP is shown, the FCC says a business must still honor an opt-out sent with any of the seven standardized words.
If a caller does not designate one of the listed methods as exclusive, FCC 26-67 says it must continue processing revocation requests made in any reasonable manner. That leaves two options: select a permitted route and disclose it consistently, or maintain a process that recognizes requests expressed reasonably in other ways. A hidden setting or an instruction that appears only in an internal procedure would not provide the disclosure that the order requires on the call or in the text.
When does the FCC consent revocation change take effect?
The order gives a trigger, not a calendar date. FCC 26-67 states that the revised rule amendments become effective 30 days after Federal Register publication. The order was adopted on September 30, 2026 and released on October 1, 2026, but release of the order is not the Federal Register publication trigger stated by the FCC.
Our check on October 13, 2026 found no Federal Register publication for these amendments. Businesses should therefore avoid putting a guessed effective date into procedures. The FCC says it will release a Public Notice with the specific effective date once it is known. Record the trigger as 30 days after Federal Register publication, watch for that publication, and update the procedure when the trigger can be calculated without guessing.
What happened to the April 2026 delay?
The 2024 requirement that an opt-out from one type of robocall counts as an opt-out from all of them never took full effect. According to footnote 7 of FCC 26-67, FCC staff waivers first delayed that "revoke all" provision to April 11, 2026 and then, on January 6, 2026, extended the delay to January 31, 2027. If you read that the requirement starts in April 2026, that date has already moved.
FCC 26-67 goes further. When it takes effect, 30 days after Federal Register publication, the category rule replaces the delayed January 31, 2027 date. Until then, the waiver keeps the revoke-all provision on hold, at the latest until January 31, 2027.
What should my business do this week?
Start with a message inventory. This is a practical preparation step, not a legal classification. List each automated call and text that customers may receive, then group messages by purpose. The FCC order's examples give useful working labels such as payment reminders, fraud alerts, multi-factor authentication, appointment reminders, and utility outage notices. Mark advertising and telemarketing separately because the category-specific treatment applies only to informational robocalls.
- Map the categories. Give each message template one primary purpose and flag any template that contains an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing.
- Choose the opt-out route. Decide whether to designate one of the methods allowed by FCC 26-67 as exclusive or keep accepting requests made in any reasonable manner.
- Show the instruction. Put the selected method on the call or in the text clearly and conspicuously. For texts, check every active template rather than only the first message in a sequence.
- Record the request. Capture the customer, channel, message category, received time, words or method used, and completion time.
- Set the suppression scope. Keep informational category suppression separate from the broader suppression required for advertising and telemarketing revocations.
- Test the handoff. Send sample opt-outs through the workflow and confirm that unclear cases reach a person before another automated message is sent.
The current timing rule still matters while you prepare. The 2024 Federal Register rule requires callers to honor do-not-call and consent revocation requests within a reasonable time, no more than ten business days after receipt. FCC 26-67 does not supply a new shorter deadline in the rule change described here. This article provides general information, not legal advice. Ask counsel to review how the rule applies to your calling and texting program.
How can automation keep categories and opt-outs aligned?
PATech Labs builds AI automation for small businesses, including reminder workflows and review steps that send exceptions to a person for approval. In this kind of workflow, each message can carry a category, and a STOP event can be routed to the suppression rule for that category. Advertising and telemarketing requests need the broader treatment stated in the FCC order.
You do not need specialized software to begin. A written list of message categories, approved templates, disclosed opt-out methods, and a request log can perform the same organizing job. The important part is that the category shown in your records matches the message the customer actually received and that the request is completed within the applicable period.
Related reading for your consent process
None of these pages covers FCC 26-67.
- Written consent rules for texting and calling customers covers the consent side of customer communications.
- The SMS follow-up consent record checklist helps organize records for follow-up messages.
- The FCC 2024 ruling on AI voice calls covers a different rule.
Frequently asked questions
What counts as a separate category of informational calls?
FCC 26-67 permits category-specific treatment for informational robocalls, which the order defines as robocalls that do not contain an advertisement or constitute telemarketing. Its example treats payment reminders as unrelated to fraud alerts, multi-factor authentication, appointment reminders, and utility outage calls. A business can use those examples to build an internal category list, then have counsel review how its actual messages fit the rule.
Does a STOP to a marketing text still stop all marketing texts?
Yes, for robocalls from that caller that contain advertising or constitute telemarketing. FCC 26-67 says a revocation made in response to such a robocall revokes consent to all future advertising or telemarketing robocalls from that caller. The informational category option does not narrow that result.
How fast do I have to honor an opt-out?
The 2024 Federal Register rule says callers must honor do-not-call and consent revocation requests within a reasonable time, no more than ten business days after receipt. That is the deadline in the current rule. Your process may complete a request sooner, but do not treat the new category rule as extra time. In the Further Notice, the FCC asks whether to shorten that maximum time. That is a question, not a rule.
Do I still need prior express written consent for marketing texts?
FCC 26-67 addresses how revocation requests are scoped and submitted. FCC 26-67 does not provide a new permission to send marketing texts without the consent otherwise required. Review the separate written-consent guide linked above and confirm your particular program with counsel.
Will customers get a one-step way to stop every future robocall?
That is not a rule in FCC 26-67. In the separate Further Notice, the FCC asks for comment on whether consumers would benefit from a one-step option to stop all future robocalls. Treat it as an open question, not as a current business requirement.
The main point for owners
FCC 26-67 gives businesses a more precise way to handle revocation for informational robocalls. Once effective, a request may be limited to the category that prompted it, and a caller may designate a clearly disclosed exclusive opt-out method. Advertising and telemarketing remain broader: one revocation covers all future advertising or telemarketing robocalls from that caller.
Prepare the categories, disclosure, request log, and suppression logic now. Keep the effective-date field open until the order appears in the Federal Register, then count 30 days from that publication. That approach preserves useful reminders and alerts where the order permits it while respecting the customer's choice in the category where the request was made.